The View From 1776
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
More Grist For The Darwinian Mill
Darwinian evolution is very far from proved.
Read Lawrence Auster’s THE DARWINIANS ADMIT THAT DARWINISM IS NOT PROVED.
For more about the insubstantial foundation of evolutionary doctrine, see Darwin’s Sand Castle.
Darwinian biologists’ claims of “proof” relate to changes within an existing species. No one can demonstrate a chain of evolution, via the many thousands or millions of transformational evolutionary differentiations that Darwin postulated, from one phylum to another, for example, from an oyster to a grasshopper.
The only thing Darwinian biologists can state truthfully is that one phylum “might” have evolved from another, a speculation based entirely upon some similarities of some characteristics.
Darwinian biologists are compelled to limit their evolutionary “demonstrations” to change in a single species such as fruit flies that have short life spans and can reproduce large numbers of generations in a short time. Unfortunately, just as Darwin found with his many years of pigeon breeding and plant hybridization, the differentiated types within these species revert over time to the original conformation.
The famous examples of white and black moths in England and heavy-beaked finches in the Galapagos, and others of the same sort, turn out to be temporary predominance of characteristics of the same species, with a reversion to the starting predominance when local conditions changed.