The View From 1776

---------------------
When people become slaves in the Servile State of socialism, their knee-jerk response to every material need is to sit and wait for a hand-out from the National Socialist political state, the Great White Father in DC.

As Alexis de Tocqueville noted in “Democracy in America” after his travels here in the early 1830s, Americans of that era simply repaired roads and bridges on their own initiative, without waiting for some government body to do the work.  Tocqueville was astonished, he said, because in socialist France there existed no village too small not to have at least one official from Paris whose job was to stop any local initiative.  Nothing could be done without orders from the Paris intendents.  As a consequence, Frenchmen under socialism became entirely self-centered and were willing to endure any measure of government despotism, so long as despots gave lip service to Liberty, Equality, and Brotherhood, and so long as they continued to receive their welfare benefits.

The atmosphere of the French Quarter is superficially charming.  But the French socialist ethos behind the doors is anything but.

The following article was posted on NewsMax.

 **********
Louisiana Officials Could Lose the Katrina Blame Game
Jeff Johnson, CNSNews.com
Wednesday, Sept. 7, 2005

The Bush administration is being widely criticized for the emergency response to Hurricane Katrina and the allegedly inadequate protection for “the big one” that residents had long feared would hit New Orleans.

But more than ten years of research and reporting on hurricane and flood damage mitigation efforts in and around New Orleans indicate that local and state officials did not use federal money that was available for levee improvements or coastal reinforcement and often did not secure local matching funds that would have generated even more federal funding.

The Orleans Levee Board, the local government entity that oversees the levees and floodgates designed to protect New Orleans and the surrounding areas from rising waters, bragged in a supplement to the Times-Picayune newspaper in December 1995 about federal money received to protect the region from hurricanes.

“In the past four years, the Orleans Levee Board has built up its arsenal. The additional defenses are so critical that Levee Commissioners marched into Congress and brought back almost $60 million to help pay for protection,” the pamphlet declared. “The most ambitious flood-fighting plan in generations was drafted. An unprecedented $140 million building campaign launched 41 projects.”

The levee board promised Times-Picayune readers that the “few manageable gaps” in the walls protecting the city from Mother Nature’s waters “will be sealed within four years (1999), completing our circle of protection.”

But less than a year later, that same levee board was denied the authority to refinance its debts. Legislative Auditor Dan Kyle “repeatedly faulted the Levee Board for the way it awards contracts, spends money and ignores public bid laws,” according to the Times-Picayune. The newspaper quoted Kyle as saying that the board was near bankruptcy and should not be allowed to refinance any bonds, or issue new ones, until it submitted an acceptable plan to achieve solvency.

Blocked from financing the local portion of the flood-fighting efforts, the levee board was unable to spend the federal matching funds that had been designated for the project.

By 1998, Louisiana’s state government had a $2 billion construction budget, but less than one tenth of one percent of that - $1.98 million - was dedicated to levee improvements in the New Orleans area. State appropriators were able to find $22 million that year to renovate a new home for the Louisiana Supreme Court and $35 million for one phase of an expansion to the New Orleans convention center.

The following year, the state legislature did appropriate $49.5 million for levee improvements, but the proposed spending had to be allocated by the state bond commission before the projects could receive financing. The commission placed the levee improvements in the “Priority 5” category, among the projects least likely to receive full or immediate funding.

The Orleans Levee Board was also forced to defer $3.7 million in capital improvement projects in its 2001 budget after residents of the area rejected a proposed tax increase to fund its expanding operations. Long-term deferments to nearly 60 projects, based on the revenue shortfall, totaled $47 million worth of work, including projects to shore up the floodwalls.

No new state money had been allocated to the area’s hurricane protection projects as of October of 2002, leaving the available 65 percent federal matching funds for such construction untouched.

“The problem is money is real tight in Baton Rouge right now,” state Sen. Francis Heitmeier (D-Algiers) told the Times-Picayune. “We have to do with what we can get.”

Louisiana Commissioner of Administration Mark Drennen told local officials that, if they reduced their requests for state funding in other, less critical areas, they would have a better chance of getting the requested funds for levee improvements. The newspaper reported that in 2000 and 2001, “the Bond Commission has approved or pledged millions of dollars for projects in Jefferson Parish, including construction of the Tournament Players Club golf course near Westwego, the relocation of Hickory Avenue in Jefferson (Parish) and historic district development in Westwego.”

There is no record of such discretionary funding requests being reduced or withdrawn, but in October of 2003 nearby St. Charles Parish did receive a federal grant for $475,000 to build bike paths on top of its levees.

Democrats Blame Bush Administration

Congressional democrats have been quick to blame the White House for poor preparation and then a weak response related to Hurricane Katrina. U.S. Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), ranking democrat on the House Government Reform Committee, joined two of his colleagues from the Transportation and Infrastructure and Homeland Security committees Tuesday in a letter requesting hearings into what the trio called a “woefully inadequate” federal response.

“Hurricane Katrina was an unstoppable force of nature,” Waxman wrote along with Reps. James Oberstar (D-Minn.) and Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.). “But it is plain that the federal government could have done more, sooner, to respond to the immediate survival needs of the residents of Louisiana and Mississippi.
“In fact, different choices for funding and planning to protect New Orleans may even have mitigated the flooding of the city,” the democrats added.

But Rep. Tom Davis (R-Va.) suggested that Waxman “overlooks many other questions that need to be asked, and prematurely faults the federal government for all governmental shortcomings; in fact, local and state government failures are not mentioned at all in [Waxman’s] letter.”

Davis wrote that Waxman’s questions about issues such as the lack of federal plans for evacuating residents without access to vehicles and the alleged failure of the Department of Homeland Security to ensure basic communications capacity for first responders might “prematurely paint the picture that these are solely, or even primarily, federal government responsibilities.

“This is not the time to attack or defend government entities for political purposes. Rather, this is a time to do the oversight we’re charged with doing,” Davis continued. “Our Committee will aggressively investigate what went wrong and what went right. We’ll do it by the book, and let the chips fall where they may.”

The House Government Reform Committee will begin hearings on federal disaster preparations and the response to Hurricane Katrina the week of Sept. 12. The House Energy and Commerce Committee is scheduled to hold hearings on the economic recovery from Katrina beginning Wednesday morning.

© 2005 CNSNews.com. All Rights Reserved.

Visit MoveOff Network Members