§ Statement of Purpose

The View from 1776 presents a framework to understand present-day issues from the viewpoint of the colonists who fought for American independence in 1776 and wrote the Constitution in 1787. Knowing and preserving those understandings, what might be called the unwritten constitution of our nation, is vital to preserving constitutional government. Without them, the bare words of the Constitution are just a Rorschach ink-blot that politicians, educators, and judges can interpret to mean anything they wish.

"We have no government armed with the power capable of contending with human passions, unbridled by morality and true religion. Our constitution is made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." John Adams, to the Officers of the First Brigade, Third Division, Massachusetts Militia, October 11, 1798.

§ Most recent entries

• Scottish Pragmatism
• Union Made
• Mainstream Media Shallow Reporting
• Nominal Unemployment And Disability Fraud
• Even Alan Greenspan Once Understood The Need For A Stable Dollar
• Jobs Are Created By Real Productive Business Investment
• Equal Pay For Equal Jobs?
• The Case For Concern
• Macroeconomists Trade Punches
• Dollar Devaluation, Not Weak Regulation, Caused the 2008 Financial Meltdown

Complete Category Archives

Categories: Recent Postings

• Constitutional Principles
• Economics
• Education
• Foreign Policy
• Junk Science
• Media & Opinion
• Political Theory
• Thought Police & PC
• Tradition & Morality
• Welfare-State Socialism

§ Monthly Archives

• May 2012
• April 2012
• March 2012
• February 2012
• January 2012
• December 2011
• November 2011
• October 2011
• September 2011
• August 2011
• July 2011
• June 2011
• May 2011
• April 2011
• March 2011
• February 2011
• January 2011
• December 2010
• November 2010
• October 2010
• September 2010
• August 2010
• July 2010
• June 2010
• May 2010
• April 2010
• March 2010
• February 2010
• January 2010
• December 2009
• November 2009
• October 2009
• September 2009
• August 2009
• July 2009
• June 2009
• May 2009
• April 2009
• March 2009
• February 2009
• January 2009
• December 2008
• November 2008
• October 2008
• September 2008
• August 2008
• July 2008
• June 2008
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• February 2008
• January 2008
• December 2007
• November 2007
• October 2007
• September 2007
• August 2007
• July 2007
• June 2007
• May 2007
• April 2007
• March 2007
• February 2007
• January 2007
• December 2006
• November 2006
• October 2006
• September 2006
• August 2006
• July 2006
• June 2006
• May 2006
• April 2006
• March 2006
• February 2006
• January 2006
• December 2005
• November 2005
• October 2005
• September 2005
• August 2005
• July 2005
• June 2005
• May 2005
• April 2005
• March 2005
• February 2005
• January 2005
• December 2004
• November 2004
• October 2004
• September 2004
• August 2004
• July 2004
• June 2004
• May 2004
• April 2004
• March 2004
• Complete Monthly Archives

§ Syndicate

• RSS 1.0
• RSS 2.0
• Atom

Join our Mailing List

Members:
Login | Register

Sunday, January 16, 2005

A Frame Work to Test the Darwinian Hypothesis

Science’s own standards relegate Darwinian evolution to the category of speculation, not fact.  Is evolutionary speculation science, or just another dogma of the secular religion of socialism?

------------
Pajama Hadin has an excellent summation of the arguments for Darwin’s hypothesis that all life shares a single ancestor.  Tested against the standards established by the National Academy of Sciences, Darwinian evolution flunks.

For a series of exchanges with readers on this subject, see Darwinian Evolution Undermines the Constitution;

Continuing the Argument About Darwinian Evolution; and

More Arguments about Darwinian Evolution